I don't know. Maybe it's just me.
I read today's big headlines about a 'controversy' with Judy Steigler's picture and went, "Oh, Oh, the Bulletin's going after our Democratic representative again."
But you read the article, and she has almost nothing to do with the 'pay cut' or the restoration thereof. Other than being married to a prosecutor. In fact, she voted FOR the pay cut.
Frankly, I doubt her political ethics are really challenged by a 5k cut in pay; and she has yet to vote the second time.
But if you were a casual browser of the paper, like so many people are, you might put the two together; Stiegler = Controversy.
Like I said, maybe I'm reading too much into it.
One things for sure. H. Bruce Miller's column in the Source, and my little blog, hasn't seemed to chasten the Bulletin.
Or, in the case of my blog, my little flea bite on their butt didn't even make them itch....
I read today's big headlines about a 'controversy' with Judy Steigler's picture and went, "Oh, Oh, the Bulletin's going after our Democratic representative again."
But you read the article, and she has almost nothing to do with the 'pay cut' or the restoration thereof. Other than being married to a prosecutor. In fact, she voted FOR the pay cut.
Frankly, I doubt her political ethics are really challenged by a 5k cut in pay; and she has yet to vote the second time.
But if you were a casual browser of the paper, like so many people are, you might put the two together; Stiegler = Controversy.
Like I said, maybe I'm reading too much into it.
One things for sure. H. Bruce Miller's column in the Source, and my little blog, hasn't seemed to chasten the Bulletin.
Or, in the case of my blog, my little flea bite on their butt didn't even make them itch....